How to prioritize what simply “must” be done
Datum: 2024-09-25 09:23
The method through which you derive a task’s priority by weighing its importance against how urgent it is is not always enough.
Some tasks slip through this net of consideration.
For you who prefer listening to reading, this post is also available as an episode of the “Done!” podcast:
What is urgent and what is important?
It is not that difficult to determine how urgent a task is. If there is not a lot of time until it needs to be done, it is urgent. And if there are fewer hours than you need to complete the task until the deadline, then it is very urgent.
Determining how important a task is can be somewhat trickier. Too many people I meet judge tasks to be important at random, thus rendering the whole method quite useless. If we put a little edge to this tendency, it is as if they are thinking “it is urgent, therefore it is important, since it’s urgent”. Thinking this way will make everything urgent and important, and everything — everything! — will need to be granted the highest priority. All the time.
Important means contributing to goal attainment
This is one of the reasons I wrote my book on priorities (my second book which has not been published in English yet). In this book, my main argument is that the tasks which contribute to us reaching the goals we are responsible for attaining are those we should consider important. Looking at it that way, the urgent/important-method suddenly becomes a very powerful tool to prioritize accurately when we have a lot on our plates and need to choose the right thing to do next. The tasks that contribute to you attaining your goals and which are also urgent are the ones with the highest priority.
And then there’s the exception, right?
When I held a lecture a few weeks ago on this topic to a group of managers at one of the national authorities, I got a most interesting question:
“But there are plenty of other tasks that simply must get done right now — even if they don’t contribute to any specific goals! They don’t fit the model. Where do they come in?”
As I see it: If we have decided to, for example together with our boss, that these kinds of tasks should always be prioritized above everything else, then they too belong amongst the highest prioritized tasks — regardless of what goals, we are responsible for attaining.
It can get crowded at the top
However, if you fill the “quota” with lots of these kinds of tasks, then you will still have too little time to work on the tasks that bring you closer to your goals.
For some people, that does not matter and they are still right to prioritize using the exception to the rule. If we have a position at work that requires us to be on our toes and chip in to help others often, then we need to have lower ambitions in terms of what we ourselves are to accomplish in other, more long-term matters that would contribute to us reaching the goals. We simply need to have fewer or less ambitious goals.
If it’s important, shouldn’t it have a corresponding goal?
If doing these “simply must”-tasks is that important, it is reasonable to consider if there should be a goal concerning handling these tasks successfully too, so that we know if we have done our job well or not. If we create a new goal for these tasks as well, they will have their rightful place amongst the most prioritized tasks (once they are urgent, of course).
Do this
Take a moment to consider the tasks you have on your list which for some obvious reason “simply must” get done — without them necessarily contributing to you attaining any of the goals you are responsible for.
Make a list of the tasks and ask yourself:
- Which of these tasks should have a corresponding goal so that I know if I am doing them in a satisfactory manner?
- Are there just a few of these tasks, which means I will have enough time to do my “actually important” tasks as well?
- If there are quite a number of them and not enough time to do everything, which ones do you need to get rid of?
- Do you have any “simply must do”-tasks on your list that someone else could do instead?
- Do you have any goals that are just there out of old habit and which you might actually let go of, thus giving you more time to do the “on your toes”-tasks?
Consciously instead of conjectured
If you bring out these “simply must do”-tasks into the light (and bring them to the attention of your boss as well), it will become easier to make an accurate assessment of your actual workload. That which is there will now also be seen and recognized, instead of being something that does not really count, even though it tends to skip the line and be prioritized above all your other tasks.
You will be able to determine what really matters and thus should be deemed important, make sure that you have appropriate goals attached to these tasks in order to clarify your progress and success, and you will have more time to work on what has now been defined as important.
What’s it like for you?
What kind of “simply must do”-tasks do you have on your list? Give me an example!
(Speaking of priorities, it’s essential to set the goal first and prioritize later.)
Want more?
If you want more tips on how to create good structure at work, there are many ways to get that from me - in podcasts, videos, books, talks and other formats.